Which would you use?

AA Ford Discussion Group relating to the repair and restoration of your AA Ford.
Post Reply
Stakebed
Posts: 1223
Joined: June 14th, 2007, 7:29 pm
Body Type: Grainbox
Model Year: 1929
Location: Illinois

Which would you use?

Post by Stakebed »

One axle casting has better wheel bearing surfaces but much worse axle clam area while the other has worse wheel bearing area and better axle clam area...

Image
Image
Image
good bearing bad clam

Image
Image
good clam bad bearing

Im going to guess the wheel bearing surface is more important than the clam surface.
User avatar
gunmetal 2
Posts: 222
Joined: April 1st, 2013, 12:51 pm
Body Type: 82-A
Model Year: 1929

Re: Which would you use?

Post by gunmetal 2 »

Take the wheel bearing axle to a good weld shop they can weld in the pited area and grind it down. just my 2 cents. good luck
Stakebed
Posts: 1223
Joined: June 14th, 2007, 7:29 pm
Body Type: Grainbox
Model Year: 1929
Location: Illinois

Re: Which would you use?

Post by Stakebed »

isnt that bearing area heat treated? Im not sure but would seem like it should be.
User avatar
spectria
Posts: 1874
Joined: May 15th, 2008, 9:53 pm
Body Type: Mail Truck, Stakebed
Model Year: 1931
Location: Quincy, Ca.

Re: Which would you use?

Post by spectria »

Stakebed wrote:isnt that bearing area heat treated? Im not sure but would seem like it should be.
The "bearing area" is probably hard, test it with a sharp file on the end, if it digs in, not treated, if it skips off, treated. Bearing alignment would be most important.
It would be very difficult get the finished surface to bearing specs, too hard to mount on a lathe unless you work at a shipyard...
Dave in Quincy, Ca. I love Pics!!!! Post them All!!! :)
Join the Ford Model AA Truck Club - membership form at http://www.fmaatc.org
Stakebed
Posts: 1223
Joined: June 14th, 2007, 7:29 pm
Body Type: Grainbox
Model Year: 1929
Location: Illinois

Re: Which would you use?

Post by Stakebed »

oh yea and if one welds it makes the area around it hot and possibly warp it all. Looks like im goin with good bearing area then. Any ideas on cleaning up/smoothing out the clam area? i need to measure and test fit and see how worn it already is. Might be able to smooth it all out and wrap a shim around it or something....

Any ideas?
User avatar
1crosscut
Posts: 877
Joined: December 25th, 2010, 7:22 pm
Body Type: 82-A
Model Year: 1929
Location: Lincoln, NE

Re: Which would you use?

Post by 1crosscut »

Go with the good bearing surface.

Run an acetaline / oxy torch around the rusted surface. Your not trying to get the base metal hot but just the surface rust. This will help break up the rust and loosen it from the axle. Use a course wire wheel on an electric drill an give it a good once over. Repeat with the torch if necessary and then use a good flat file on it to smooth it out. You might find that a hammer and a flat or slightly rounded punch will break the rust out of the deeper pits etc... I think that you will find it turns out pretty decent. On the clam shell there are two groves that run around the inside surface of them to help distribute the grease. I used a thin cut off wheel on an air grinder to clean out the groves. The circumference of the cut off wheel matched the curve pretty well. There isn't a whole lot of movement in this area unless you routinely load the truck heavy. Grease it up really good and you will be set for a long time.
------------
Dave
Bob C
Posts: 1442
Joined: April 24th, 2003, 11:50 am
Body Type: Mail truck, Stake tr
Model Year: 1931
Location: SO CAL

Re: Which would you use?

Post by Bob C »

I would sandblast the axle housing where the saddles go and sandblast the saddles and
see how they fit. If they are real loose I would mill a little off the mating surfaces of the
saddles, that should tighten them up.

Bob
User avatar
Neil Wilson
Posts: 3062
Joined: February 5th, 2003, 9:42 pm
Body Type: 82-A/89-A
Model Year: 1930
Location: Boulder, CO
Contact:

Re: Which would you use?

Post by Neil Wilson »

I likely have a pair of rear axle housing which are in good condition. Shipping is the costly problem. What axle is it (worm without emergency, worm with emergency, '30/'31 bevel type)?
Regards, Neil Wilson
______________________________________
aafords.com@gmail.com - use this email for contact
https://aafords.com/
Stakebed
Posts: 1223
Joined: June 14th, 2007, 7:29 pm
Body Type: Grainbox
Model Year: 1929
Location: Illinois

Re: Which would you use?

Post by Stakebed »

thier both 29 worms with emergency. yea shipping would be killer for it...
User avatar
Chris Haynes
Posts: 2203
Joined: September 7th, 2003, 5:18 pm
Body Type: 82A
Model Year: 1930
Location: Camarillo, CA

Re: Which would you use?

Post by Chris Haynes »

An old time mechanic I know told me that they used to make new bearing races. You would put the axle housing in a large lathe to turn it down to the size needed to press the new race on to it. You would think there would be some of those races floating around somewhere.
Stakebed
Posts: 1223
Joined: June 14th, 2007, 7:29 pm
Body Type: Grainbox
Model Year: 1929
Location: Illinois

Re: Which would you use?

Post by Stakebed »

race isnt the problem, problem is trying to get this thing balanced to actually fit on a lathe once you find one of those lol.

ill use the good bearing races and see what i can do with the clam area. should be able to figure somehting out.
Bladehorse
Posts: 112
Joined: November 9th, 2009, 9:22 pm
Body Type: 185-A
Model Year: 1930

Re: Which would you use?

Post by Bladehorse »

@ Stakebed. Its actually easier than it seems. I turned both 1/2's of the rear end down, one at a time mind ya, but with a good grip on the chuck, and ram in the tailstock, I had no issues of creep. I did counterbalance with somthing for the side with the pinion tho. I remember bolting it thru the housing hole. Ill have to dig up the results and post them. I have to wonder if the suppiers sell sleve repair kits for the AA axles like the A's have. THat is such an easy fix(At least for the hub) I too would scale the housing at the pivot and check for excessive play. If loose, I would turn down the axle at the spring pivot, and weld/braze up the shells, and re machine(Much easier to controll temper and warp on those vs the housing methinks.)
Stakebed
Posts: 1223
Joined: June 14th, 2007, 7:29 pm
Body Type: Grainbox
Model Year: 1929
Location: Illinois

Re: Which would you use?

Post by Stakebed »

yea i figured it could be balanced but thats an awful lot of extra weight to be flinging around. going to need to find a big lathe!
User avatar
Chris Haynes
Posts: 2203
Joined: September 7th, 2003, 5:18 pm
Body Type: 82A
Model Year: 1930
Location: Camarillo, CA

Re: Which would you use?

Post by Chris Haynes »

Stakebed wrote:yea i figured it could be balanced but thats an awful lot of extra weight to be flinging around. going to need to find a big lathe!

Nobody says you have to do at high speed.
Bladehorse
Posts: 112
Joined: November 9th, 2009, 9:22 pm
Body Type: 185-A
Model Year: 1930

Re: Which would you use?

Post by Bladehorse »

slow, but a lot of pressure with carbide. Ideally insert tooling, then ya can go up on the speed a bit. THe case hardening on the forgings is rather deep, and very hard. Ideally ground after, but if its going to be sleeved, its not nessesary.
Post Reply