AA FORD SHOCKS
-
- Posts: 134
- Joined: December 8th, 2013, 4:21 pm
- Body Type: 76-A
- Model Year: 1929
- Location: 8453 Main St Kinsman Ohio 44428
AA FORD SHOCKS
DID AA FORDS HAVE SHOCKS ON THE FRONT AXLE?
- Neil Wilson
- Posts: 3062
- Joined: February 5th, 2003, 9:42 pm
- Body Type: 82-A/89-A
- Model Year: 1930
- Location: Boulder, CO
- Contact:
Re: AA FORD SHOCKS
Through December 1929, the AA had front shocks which were the same as the A chassis. The shock arms were different for the AA. 1930/1931 AA's did not have shocks.Matt wrote:DID AA FORDS HAVE SHOCKS ON THE FRONT AXLE?
Last edited by Neil Wilson on October 12th, 2017, 7:09 am, edited 1 time in total.
Regards, Neil Wilson
______________________________________
aafords.com@gmail.com - use this email for contact
https://aafords.com/
______________________________________
aafords.com@gmail.com - use this email for contact
https://aafords.com/
- 1crosscut
- Posts: 877
- Joined: December 25th, 2010, 7:22 pm
- Body Type: 82-A
- Model Year: 1929
- Location: Lincoln, NE
Re: AA FORD SHOCKS
Correct me if I am not reading your post correctly Neil but the shock arms are different in that they are longer.
------------
Dave
Dave
- Neil Wilson
- Posts: 3062
- Joined: February 5th, 2003, 9:42 pm
- Body Type: 82-A/89-A
- Model Year: 1930
- Location: Boulder, CO
- Contact:
Re: AA FORD SHOCKS
Yes longer but not that simple! Below is from the upcoming revision 4 of the RGJS (four shock arm styles).1crosscut wrote:Correct me if I am not reading your post correctly Neil but the shock arms are different in that they are longer.
- The following bullets lists the beginning date and change information for each style of shock arm.
• Style 1 – Beginning of production – June 1928 – 5-3/4" long with or without numbers on the clamping end a 1/4" flange below the ball
• Style 2 – June 1928 – August 1928 – 5-3/4" long without numbers on the clamping end and a 7/16" flange below the ball
• Style 3 – June 1928 – July 1929 – 6-3/8" long without numbers on the clamping end and either a 1/4" or 7/16" flange below the ball
• Style 4 – July 1929 – December 1929 – 6-3/8" long without numbers on the clamping end, either a 1/4" or 7/16" flange below the ball and had a 5/32" deep (shallow) recess added on the clamping end
Figure 2 – AA-18047 Front Shock Absorber Arms.
- Attachments
-
- xxe23 f02.jpg (163.8 KiB) Viewed 9673 times
Regards, Neil Wilson
______________________________________
aafords.com@gmail.com - use this email for contact
https://aafords.com/
______________________________________
aafords.com@gmail.com - use this email for contact
https://aafords.com/
- 1crosscut
- Posts: 877
- Joined: December 25th, 2010, 7:22 pm
- Body Type: 82-A
- Model Year: 1929
- Location: Lincoln, NE
Re: AA FORD SHOCKS
Great information Neil. I've managed to get a few of them and with your information it looks like I should be able to date them.
------------
Dave
Dave
- Chris Haynes
- Posts: 2203
- Joined: September 7th, 2003, 5:18 pm
- Body Type: 82A
- Model Year: 1930
- Location: Camarillo, CA
Re: AA FORD SHOCKS
The 1931 AA Hearse and Parlor van also had front shocks. But much heavier than the 1928 type.
- tiredtruckrestorer
- Posts: 338
- Joined: April 20th, 2003, 7:09 pm
- Model Year: 1931
- Location: Orwigsburg, PA
Re: AA FORD SHOCKS
I believe the Funeral Service, Funeral Coach, and Ambulance only had rear shock absorbers, no fronts.
Keith
Keith
- Neil Wilson
- Posts: 3062
- Joined: February 5th, 2003, 9:42 pm
- Body Type: 82-A/89-A
- Model Year: 1930
- Location: Boulder, CO
- Contact:
Re: AA FORD SHOCKS
Yes Keith, that is what my research shows. And, that is what is in the new E supplement of the RGJS (to be released in December hopefully).tiredtruckrestorer wrote:I believe the Funeral Service, Funeral Coach, and Ambulance only had rear shock absorbers, no fronts.
Keith
- Attachments
-
- e23 f01 q8.jpg (286.55 KiB) Viewed 9603 times
Regards, Neil Wilson
______________________________________
aafords.com@gmail.com - use this email for contact
https://aafords.com/
______________________________________
aafords.com@gmail.com - use this email for contact
https://aafords.com/
-
- Posts: 28
- Joined: October 8th, 2017, 8:58 pm
- Body Type: platform
- Model Year: 1928
Re: AA FORD SHOCKS
Thanks for all the shock info. The left front shock is equipped with the Type 1 arm and there are no markings on the arm. There are no rear shocks or any evidence of past shock mountings.. I will keep a lookout for the correct rear shocks and the required mounts, or i may (or may not) fabricate some hardware for mounting modern tubular shocks.
I plan to mount a new 10 leaf passenger car spring and add a couple of leafs to bring up the ride height a bit. I have not found a source for AA springs yet.
Regards, Alan in Roberts Creek
I plan to mount a new 10 leaf passenger car spring and add a couple of leafs to bring up the ride height a bit. I have not found a source for AA springs yet.
Regards, Alan in Roberts Creek
- Neil Wilson
- Posts: 3062
- Joined: February 5th, 2003, 9:42 pm
- Body Type: 82-A/89-A
- Model Year: 1930
- Location: Boulder, CO
- Contact:
Re: AA FORD SHOCKS
Alan, check the above posts - there are no rear shocks for AA's except for a few very rare 1931 AA's.Moto Largo wrote: ↑October 11th, 2017, 12:43 pmThanks for all the shock info. The left front shock is equipped with the Type 1 arm and there are no markings on the arm. There are no rear shocks or any evidence of past shock mountings.. I will keep a lookout for the correct rear shocks and the required mounts, or i may (or may not) fabricate some hardware for mounting modern tubular shocks.
I plan to mount a new 10 leaf passenger car spring and add a couple of leafs to bring up the ride height a bit. I have not found a source for AA springs yet.
Regards, Alan in Roberts Creek
Regards, Neil Wilson
______________________________________
aafords.com@gmail.com - use this email for contact
https://aafords.com/
______________________________________
aafords.com@gmail.com - use this email for contact
https://aafords.com/